Whether
you are watching pro sports, prep sports, or semi professional sports, there is
a common thread between all of them. Violence sells. It is attractive to
marketers and draws the attention to the product. Take one look at a Dick’s
Sporting goods commercial and watch Ndamukong Suh “hunt” the quarterback, (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDiepg-OhQQ)
or watch an episode of Sports Center, plays which are not even critical to the
outcome of the game will be shown just because it draws in viewers. But on the advertising front, violence is
everywhere.
With
this commercial, Suh is seen with a grimacing, aggressive look on his face,
wanting to leave no prisoners. The music in the background is low and
aggressive, aiding with the main point of the commercial. “Hunting” the
quarterback is what he is doing, implying death and pain to his opponent.
Instead of showing in game footage where it may be violent, but can be connected
to the “nature of the game”, instead he is in an urban environment. Completely disconnected from the actual
activities of the sport. The emphasis on
the camera angle is on Suh as he barrels towards the bystander in the
commercial who is merely trying out a new pair of football cleats. But never
the less Suh hits him with a devastatingly violent hit.
So
what does this show us? It shows us that violence in sports and sport
advertising is a problem and one that needs to be addressed sooner rather than
later. Violence is something that isn’t always seen in day-to-day life, and is
shied away from when it is, so why is it so appealing in sport
advertising? Could it be the over
emphasis of violence and physicality in sport?
Not
only commercials including sports are violent, but also commercials played
during broadcasted sports are violent. According to a government study, parents
are urged to sit and watch sports on television with their children, to limit
the amount of sports they take in on TV, and to even implement commercial
skipping technology (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15574602)
Is this what sporting culture has come to? The commercials including sports and
commercials played during sport are so violent that parents need to monitor the
sports intake their child has? I thought sports were supposed to promote good
morals and values in children, not be unsafe and producing of a negative
experience for children.
When
you look at the promotion of sports to be viewed on television, what do you
see? Big bone shattering hits, or finesse plays that require skill and agility?
The big hits are what shine through. It is evident through this college
football promo from 2009 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf-F49brV54
) How many big hits are displayed? In every frame you can see shades of
physical dominance and violence. This says a lot about our culture and what is
so imbedded in our culture. What could possibly get you more excited for a
football game or games than big hits? Apparently to promoters and advertisers
it is second to none. Nothing sells better than a big hit.
So
this leads to the bigger question of what can or should be done to change? Is
it the responsibility of the consumer or the advertiser? They one doing the
advertising will change nothing if it is continually working. If it is not
broken, don’t try to fix it. So it lies in the hands of the consumer. If the
consumers want to see change in the way that products are being advertised to
them, a stand needs to be made and a movement must be started. Violence in
Sport advertising creates a bad example for the kids and children watching the
event, but if the violence in sport advertising disappears, violence is still
prominent in sports themselves, which is the larger social issue at hand.
From
boxing, to hockey and football, and everywhere in between, violence in sports
cannot be escaped. If you eliminate
violence from sport advertising, it still lives on in sports and visa versa,
and the ability to dismiss violence from sports is something that would be very
difficult to accomplish. Violence in sport is very much socially constructed
and has been that way for years. Whether it is linked to war and violence or
physical dominance and violence, it seems to have always been embedded within
society. Its up for the consumer to
decide if that is a fight worth fighting, should we as consumers just be aware
that it exists? Or become the change that we hope to see within sporting
culture?
No comments:
Post a Comment